Legends of Dominance - 05
Legends of Dominance - 05 by Mistress Michelle Peters et al. and posted with permission (All information herein is provided by author) Legends of Dominance Article Index |
Joyceline & Bizarbara
- Research by Mistress Michelle Peters
This is a ad for Joyceline and Bizarbara , issue 5, 1976. Joyceline And Bizarbara were one of the first traveling B&D shows in the US and other countries, than featured a black and white Mistress. The slave that's in these photos contacted me in 1976, wanting to serve me, he said he lived in the same building where Tuesday Welds ( the actress ) lives. So I drove my brand new 1977 Corvette from Michigan to California to meet this slave. Oh, yes he lived in the same building as Tuesday Welds, but he lived in the bathroom. That first night I stayed there , it cold , rainy and water was coming in a broken window , splashing me on the face, it was horrible. I packed up my things and moved down the street to the Holiday Inn.
--Mistress Michelle
Joycelin and Bizarbara are Dominant Queens who travel the world doing shows, private and on the theater stage. The show includes Lesbian Love, Domination, Golden Showers, Defecation (when requested) on the Male Slave, Total Flogging, Branding, Crown of Thorns and finally the King and Queen.
Males in the audience may participate when prior arrangements are made. Ladies in the audience are always invited to help them.
After the show their slave is turned over to couples in the crowd for private use. Those females in need of services provided by the slave can arrange to rent him.
After all shows Joycelin and Bizarbara are available for private sessions. They never travel without their personal slave in attendance or being part of the shows.
Joyceline and Bizarbara are available for modeling, still and motion pictures. They would love to make a real honest-to-god Domination Movie along with a Crucifixion (simulated).
F-3045: ALL STATES
Article found in San Francisco/USA Nov. 1988
Black Dominatrixes are all about and interviews and demonstrations by the various ladies let us start with Bizarbara married to an affluent white man, an admitted Slave Owner of a white male slave whom she readily and proudly presents to her circle of friends as her personal slave and toilet both she and her white husband who is also a Stud and Master do enjoy the use of slaves Male and Female. Bizarbara frequently visits such places with her Lady Friends Joycelin and Lady Lidia a Fantastic Slave Trainer for (Lesbian Clientele) and of course their ever present Slave Robert. Bizarbara, a licorice toned true Dominatrix glories in her act and specialty tows her Slave and Slave Robert around the Apartment or Club offering the use of other Slaves and Slave Robert to couples who may care to...use the slaves for After Sex Clean-up. Bizarbara allows her selected safe and sane sexual friends to use her Slaves under direction.
Bizarbara although herself NOT GAY and will NOT permit her Slaves to be BI or Gay but does allow her Homosexual Friends to remove the Cum within his body. It belongs to Bizarbara and she shall remove or release it at her pleasure or profit. Asked whether she when on Stage or before the camera if she fakes a scene? The question seemed to irritate Bizarbara and she replied "Hell No", We meaning Jocelin and Lady Lida her business partners whenever we use Slave Robert you can rest assured when we whip, flog,brand him it is for real and nothing is faked...that is what separates the mules form the race horses so to speak-the average Bay Area Whore and that is what most of the advertised Dominatrixes are, just that whore with a whip with about as much class as a bucket of snot a lot of evil no good sluts on drugs and disease ie; AIDS, Herpes Clap.
Joycelin and Bizarbra go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OBEAHSOCIETY
--Research by Mistress Michelle Peters
Lady Cheyenne
Meet Lady Cheyenne, Head Mistress of Lady Cheyenne's House of Dominance, Located in Columbus, Ohio.
Lady Cheyenne and her staff of well trained Dominas will help you explore every level and aspect of the S/M scene.
This house promises the intimacy of a private session, while delivering the benefits of an elaborate well-equipped studio. A gracious and well spoken lady, I enjoyed chatting with Lady Cheyenne. Visit her parlor and you're guaranteed an S/M good time.
Mistress Jacqueline; How did you first get involved in the S/M scene?
Lady Cheyenne; One of my best friends, Mistress Amanda's mother was a lifestyle Dominatrix. Having always had an interest but never knowing an actual scene existed, I was thrilled to no end when she started inviting me to parties. One thing lead to another.
Mistress Jacqueline: What do you like best about being a Dominatrix?
Lady Cheyenne: The play.The actual interaction with submissives is so much fun for me. Every day is different. I may be a sheriff one day, a nanny the next and a Mistress in black leather the day after that. It's a riotous amount of fun!
Mistress Jacqueline; What aspect of the S/M lifestyle do you find most intriguing?
Lady Cheyenne: To borrow from the name of your magazine, I like the "power exchange." When I begin playing with someone, for that period of time, I do own them. I can cause them to feel fear, pain, humiliation, acceptance or whatever is appropriate. Ifs like an exotic vacation from reality.
Mistress Jacqueline; What kind fetish clothing do you enjoy wearing?
Lady Cheyenne: Leather all the way. The smell, the feel of it... everything about it. I also have a major shoe fetish. Even in my vanilla life, I manage to find high heel and open toe tennis shoes. Bless the Spice Girls who brought the funky, high platform shoe into the mainstream.
Mistress Jacqueline: Describe your dungeon.
Lady Cheyenne: My studio is like a set out of 'Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom'. It has eight different rooms. Four of them are actual dungeons with such elaborate equipment as a Catherine's Wheel, motorized suspension, electrical play, bondage chairs, stretching racks, jail cells, cages, stockades, whips, paddles, riding crops, custom made leather and chain restraints for every part of the body and more.
We also have an old-fashioned class room, a cross dressing parlor and a Judge's Chamber where I try the accused before a jury of MY peers. In the spring, I hope to have our climate control sensory deprivation chamber open. I also happen to have an incredibly beautiful and talented staff of lifestyle Dominas. It is a powerhouse of beauty and skill.
Mistress Jacqueline: What are your favorite toys? Why?
Lady Cheyenne: My favorite toys seem to go in spurts. Right now I like the violet wand. I can ground myself to it so that the submissive feels the sparks coming right from my own finger tips. What a rush!
Mistress Jacqueline: When it comes to doing sessions, are you a specialist in any one area or would you consider yourself to be more of a general practitioner?
Lady Cheyenne: Tricky question. If I can narrow down my specialty, it would be "escape." I am not a female supremacist.
Mistress Jaqueline: What can someone expect when they come to you for a session.
Lady Cheyenne: Myself and my staff treat everyone as individuals. No two people are exactly alike. We like to get to know someone and push their limits.
Mistress Jacqueline: Tell me a little about these beautiful Dominas.
Lady Cheyenne: Yes, the ladies you see are all available for sessions. They're all so special, slaves have a hard time choosing. Subs visit again and again.They can have a different experience every time. Amanda Kane is second generation. She was actually raised by a lifestyle Dominatrix. Amanda loves role play and she's very into administering corporal punishment. Mistress Ivy has been into this for a very long time. Foot servitude is her personal favorite form of worship. Though all of us are totally dominant, Mistress E can be switchable if the situation is right. E's specialty area is cross dressing. Mistress Priscilla is our newest addition. She may look like your younger sister, but she`s thrilled with the scene and she's having a wonderful time.
Mistress Jacqueline: What kind of facilities do you have for cross dressers?
Lady Cheyenne: We have a mock beauty parlor, with white counters, frilly curtains, mirrors all around and a wardrobe to die for.
Mistress Jacqueline; Tell us about the hardest spanking you ever gave.Why did you do it - what did you use?
Lady Cheyenne; Having given quite a few spankings in my life time, I can't single out just one.What I can tell you is that for hard spankings, a wooden paddle is my favorite. The whistling sound as it moves, the SMACK at the point of impact - the nice rosy color...or eventually even black, blue or purple. In fact, I think I've invented a few new colors on a naughty bottom a time or two.
Mistress Jacqueline: How do you humiliate slaves?
Lady Cheyenne: First, I find out what their particular weakness is. What is humiliating for one slave may not be for another. I get into their head and expose their insecurities. While I do respect the limitations given to me up front, no one should come to see me for humiliation if that is not exactly what they want. I've been known to reduce strong men to tears with mere words. Humiliation is typically best when ail of the other Dominas at my studio are involved.
Mistress Jacqueline: Are you available for overnight and/or extended sessions?How does a session like this work?
Lady Cheyenne: Oh yes! We provide a whole new concept in hospitality at my bed and breakfast. All six members of my staff are involved...it is a real break from reality. I would not recommend an overnight to the weak of heart.
Mistress Jacqueline; What other types of sessions do you enjoy?
Lady Cheyenne: Whatever the area of play, chemistry with the submissive is everything. I get off on knowing I am blowing someone's mind whatever the scenario.
Mistress Jacqueline; How would you describe the ideal slave?
Lady Cheyenne: Anyone who is open to exploring their deepest fantasies,my deepest fantasies...
Mistress Jacqueline: How can a potential slave get in your good graces?
Lady Cheyenne: Just by being honest and open minded. A true curiosity in a beginner or the directness from an experienced player will win my respect.
Mistress Jacqueline: What methods do you use to turn your subject into obedient slaves? Describe your slave training program.
Lady Cheyenne; Again, people are all different. I like to find a person's buttons and push them accordingly. I allow no topping from the bottom. No manipulation from a submissive is tolerated.While playing with me, they will be at my whim. Period.
Mistress Jacqueline: Would you describe yourself as sensual or sadistic - why?
Lady Cheyenne: Oh, both! What a better way to coax a reluctant slave into taking even more punishment if all the while I am soothing him with my seductive voice or breathing into his ear. Mixing it up is awesome. Unbelievably erotic and shockingly cruel at the same time...that .is what I love. In addition, I love the way they feel my breath on their neck or back while I am whipping them. They get all worked up but they know, they can never touch me. Ha ha. Oh, to make a living of being so cruel.
Mistress Jacqueline: Does your stable consist of both male and female slaves or are you the kind of Dom who thinks that only men should be submissive?
Lady Cheyenne: Anyone who likes to If play is fine with me. Male, female, it doesn't &. matter. Gender can be a factor but not always.
Mistress Jacqueline: What would you consider to be most outstanding about you as a Dominatrix?
Lady Cheyenne: The fact that I am down to earth, honest and open. My staff is as well. We like to play and have a great amount of fun, from shockingly cruel to unbelievably erotic scenarios. We are up front about what we like, don't like, and what we are willing to accept from a slave. A submissive can expect us to be 100% for real.
Mistress Jacqueline: Is there any S/M fantasy that you, yourself would like to experience that you haven't, to date?
Lady Cheyenne: Bill Gates in my dungeon for 24 hours. Real time. No safe word. Of all the men that are in need of manners, he is on the top of my list!
Mistress Jacqueline: Slaves like to know about the woman who dominates them. What are your other interests?
Lady Cheyenne: Jogging, water skiing, gardening, theater and shopping, shopping.
Mistress Jacqueline: How can a potential slave get in touch?
Lady Cheyenne: He can look up my web page . . . www.ladycheyenne.com or call 614-470-2251
Lady Chrystal
- Interview from Power Xchange Magazine
- Letters Editor Dominant Mystique Newspaper
Rare photo of Lady Chrystal
In late 1975 or early 1976, Ritchie Spadafora and Janus Rainer of Aradia Enterprises/Matriarch Press published Corporal News, a newspaper to compete with Fetish Times newspaper. It was easier and cheaper to produce a newspaper than a magazine. Appearing on the very first cover of Corporal News was Vickie Vaneri aka Miss Vickie Lou. Months later Richie and Janus dissolved their business partnership. Richie and Sandy York formed Esoteric Press and Corporal News became Corporal newspaper, at that time I was asked to write a column for Corporal, that column was " Mistress Michelle Speaks Out!" In this site you will read many of the articles I wrote, see the actual photos and talk to those who also appeared in that fine newspaper. The sister newspaper, Dominant Mystique was published months later by Richie, Lady Crystal was the first editor and we also discuss the journalists, artist of that publication. Mistress Michelle
I welcome your letters and comments provided they are typed or printed, doubled spaced, and written on one side of the paper only. It is important that they are double spaced to allow room to correct punctuation and spelling errors.
Anything to strongly resembling chicken scratching will automatically find itself in the circular file. Unless otherwise requested all letters received will be deemed fit for publication. Address all mail to:
- Lady Chrystal, Esoteric
- Press, Box 30482, .JFK Station,
- Jamaica, N.Y. 11430.
Dear Lady Chrystal,
I am a thirty-six year old art director for an advertising firm in Manhattan's east 20's. For seven years my husband and I have had a marriage that I have thought of as based on role reversal. I had never thought of our relationship as involving anything kinky or unusual. Recently, though, my husband brought home a copy of Dominant Mystique to show to me. He had seen it at a local newsstand, or so he said.
Having read the last five or six editions of your publication, I am somewhat confused as to the nature of our relationship. That is, some of what goes on in our apartment is a lot like some of the apparently subterranean activities that your domiantrixes and slaves describe in your paper. I have, in fact, started to worry that what I previously saw as normal, feminist influenced aspects to a liberated relationship are, in reality, part of a sado-masochistic subculture that is weird and bizarre. Alternatively, I suppose, the activities that my husband and I have in common with some of the writers in your paper are, in fact, normal, feminist influenced activities that, for one reason or another, have been packaged as "bizarre" and "sado-masochistic.
The writers in your magazine range from some who are committed to building a "matriarchal subculture," to others who are into various kinky activities, to others who do little more than fantasize. It appears to me, though, that many of your male readers are ordinary men whose desire for role reversal or a female-oriented relationship has been frustrated by a sexist society that refuses to allow women power and that has made men who desire to cater to a strong, dominant woman to feel ashamed of themselves to the point where fantasy is almost the only outlet. I believe that the classical image of sado-masochism should be reclassified as just a stronger version of role reversal, and that role reversal could be presented as a palatable alternative to a large portion of the population of both sexes. This is especially important in light of .the bad press homosexual sado- masochism has been getting. (In addition, I think that a good portion of male heterosexual masochists are simply men who desire role reversal, i.e., female dominance, but have been intimidated by their societally imposed self image and the fear of ridicule to the point where the leather imagery, etc. is the only outlet they have.)
When I first met my husband, we both worked for the same advertising firm. We dated a few times, and he was quite attracted to me, almost excessively. I told him one evening that I had little interest in a heavy relationship or marriage. The reason was that men are too demanding; I would have to give up a career that was already earning me a six figure income in today's dollars and I did not like to cook and clean.
Paul laughed and told me that I had an old-fashioned idea of marriage, that he wanted a marriage that was based on equality. To him, that meant that if he wanted the marriage badly enough, which he did, he would gladly cook, clean, do all the housework and do everything my way. He told me that he would gladly play the role of "wife" to the right woman. I jokingly rejoined "Well then, let's get married!" which we did about a year later.
Paul does all the laundry, cooking, etc. He also takes on considerable responsibilities of the car, the bills, etc. Soon after our marriage I began to feel less stress than ever mainly because Paul was bending over backwards to make life easy for me. He - even changed his last name to mine, which I surprised me, but in the long run made a lot i of sense. Since we've been married, I have been promoted several times and now earn considerably more money than Paul does. I have several times offered to let Paul stay home and be my full-time housewife, but Paul prefers to combine his career with catering to me.
Our marriage has been far from a completely smooth trail, but from day one, Paul and I were in complete agreement that I was the dominant one so that whenever Paul disagreed with something I wanted I would always remind him, "Whose the boss, Paul? Why did I marry you, Paul?" and he would come around pretty easily Paul always says that I should slap him in the face or hit him if I am angry with him, but I have no interest in that and have only done it once. When we were first dating, Paul would always compliment my blonde hair and my legs, and would give me flowers. Less conventionally, he would get into long conversations about how the traditional male- dominated relationship wasn't the only alternative, and that he desired to be dominated by a woman and to cater to her.
He said that in some ancient civilizations that was the norm. Eventually, I told him that quite frankly, I would have liked to live in a civilization like that, but why on earth would he want to be oppressed? Paul's answer, which eventually made some sense but did not at first, was that his first and most important need was to fulfill his sexuality, and that his sexuality had an infantile and dependent quality in that he needed to be dominated sexually in order to be fulfilled and that sex wasn't fulfilling for him unless his woman controlled, initiated and dominated it. In effect, he said that he couldn't be fulfilled sexually without letting the woman express herself first and control him. In return for this privilege he would willingly sacrifice his autonomy and identity to a woman. Having discussed this idea with a few of my girlfriends, I found that some of them were jealous that I could get a man so devoted and vulnerable to me. Iri fact, I felt quite lucky to have found Paul until, so many years later, I have read your magazine only to find that there are more men like Paul out there than the interested women know what to do with. Which surprises me more in light of my girlfriends' reactions to Paul's devotion to me over the years.
At one point, Paul asked me to wear high heels when we go out on date, which surprised me because when I wear heels I am about an inch taller than him. Since then I learned that he likes me to be taller. I also wear stockings and open-toed shoes at his request, about once a week. At night, after work or on weekends, Paul will massage my feet and occasionally lick them or even suck on them. Doing that has a vaguely erotic sensation, doesn't bother me in the least, and seems to turn Paul on so I never complained about it. Only recently I learned that doing that was connected to his desire to be dominated. Sexually we usually focus on cunnilingus, at which Paul is adept, with Paul masturbating himself. When we do have intercourse, usually on the nights that I wear high heels for him, I am on top, and tie his hands with my black stockings, as he requested. Paul never initiates sexual activity in the least; he has always asked that that be my job.
Sometimes I find this boring, but I must say, I have more org£.sms weekly than anyone I know, so that is nut a problem. All in all, I think that our lifestyle has been quite fulfilling and, potentially, not out of the ordinary. I believe that few mar- riages would end in divorce if a female-oriented and dominated relationship were a valid option that men weren't ashamed of and women could believe in. I wonder if any of your other readers have thought about marketing the concept of female dominance as an alternative expression of feminism as a form that subsumes female dominant sado-masochism?
- Sincerely,
- Jayne
Dear Jayne,
Let us begin by clarifying a few things.
One can hardly say that the activities described in this paper are subterranean, which means existing or working in secret.
Not when there are as many publications, films, organizations, and public clubs as there are. Also, what is generally published in Dominant Mystique is usually not considered, among those aware in the scene, to be sado-masochistic. Though some may be considered as such, most material concerns itself with what is known as "D/S" -Domination and Submission. What you refer to as a sado-masochistic subculture is known as the "scene," which encompasses a whole spectrum of behaviors and activities, of which S/M is considered an extreme end. As for being weird and bizarre; Yes, sometimes people are weird (of strange [exciting wonder or awe; strikingly uncommon] or extraordinary character -Webster's Seventh Collegiate) and oftentimes their costuming may be bizarre (strikingly out of the ordinary). Wherein is the crime or shame in being either of these?
When we talk about feminism, the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes, we are talking about the most radical restructuring ever in modern civilization. Think about it! We know historically that social change has always involved revolution, and revolutions involve many factions, including extremists. So, in this social revolution of rights and power for women, some women are using different strategies and tactics. Some women, rather than shutting men out of their lives because they can be such selfish beasts, are allowing men in their lives but strictly on their own terms. Like you. Which is the way men have treated women.
You see, the curious thing is that if roles were actually reversed, if the status attained by women was to an equivalent of that so long enjoyed by men, that position would not be dissimilar to the positions the women in this newspaper have chosen to take. The treatment we dominant women choose to bestow on the men in our lives is, by and large, no different than the way men have treated women for ages. Women for a long time were essentially considered the property of men - their father's, then their husband's. They had little, if any, economic or political rights; they were expected to maintain the home, birth and raise the children, cater to their husband (and sometimes their father) sexually and ignore their own sexuality, suffer verbal and physical abuse from their man for either arousal o.r amusement, and God forbid they should ever question or complain. When some of us women choose to put the shoe on the other foot and truly reverse roles, we are thought of as "weird and bizarre sado- masochists" with all the possible negative connotations.
As for the use of sexuality in managing a man, that is their vulnerability. Men seemed to have no qualms about using 'vulnerability, lesser physical strength, to overpower us, and established social attitudes and restrictions to perpetuate both the actual physical condition and the belief - in women that they were weaker. Are dominant women who manipulate men through their weakness, their various sexual needs which they desire to gratify, doing anything so different? Actually, they are. At this point in time, female domination is not forced on a man he has social options. For whatever reasons, a man may have a strong desire and need to be dominated by a woman but he has the freedom to choose such a situation. Women have not had such choices.
To sum this all up in a nutshell, if you'll pardon the pun, when you get a man by his swollen and tender testicles, you've truly got him by the balls and the rest will follow, if you want it.
To sum this all up in a nutshell, if you'll pardon the pun, when you get a man by his swollen and tender testicles, you've truly got him by the balls and the rest will follow, if you want it. I wish you had stated your closing question more intelligently, but I feel I am speaking for many other dominant women when I say that we feel that our practice of female domination puts us in the ranks of the revolutionaries. I would like to hear any reactions to this letter or to my response.
Lady C
--Compiled by Mistress Michelle and slave english
The Loft
| The Loft | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Type of Venue: | Dungeon |
| Current status: | Defunct |
| Address: | 50 Watts St. (off 6th Ave} New York City |
| Country | New York City |
| Source: | Legends of Dominance |
The Loft was created primarliy for Lady Chrsytal. In 1978 Lady Chrystal attended a Corporal Party and met one of the hosts, Richie (Spadafora) Shore, pubisher & owner of Esoteric Press, along with Sandy York. Richie lived in NY and Lady Chrystal lived not to far from me in Royal Oak , Mi. (at the time I lived in Troy, Mi and would go to NYC to the Corporal parties once a month.) I wrote a column for Corporal called , " Mistress Michelle Speaks Out," for several years. Many have commented that during the mid 70s there were a lot of Mistresses that came out of Detroit....not really , it was only a reason for Richie to travel to see Chrystal. Chrsytal ended up moving in with Richie in the late part of 1980. Chrstyal wanted a Club , so Richie funded it. In the late 80`s to early 90's Richie had met Vickie Reeves, married her and formed Fantastic Books in Amityville NY.
Nicole and Lady Chrystal are proud to announce the grand opening of New York's plushest S&M club.
To help celebrate the great event Corporal is holding It's fall extravaganza on Friday, September 19th. and Saturday September 20th. Both nights will feature such special guests as Mistress Hlldegard. Mistress Nicole (of Boston), Mistress Mir, Mistress Sarona, Slave Jackie, slave Alice, and many, many others.
Your hostesses for both nights are the lovely Nicole, the beautiful Lady Chrystal, and the always sensual and intriguing Sandy York. Admission price is $35.00 for men, $25.00 for dressed TVs, ladies are free. Admission includes a year's regu(ar membership in the club.
The club is located at 50 Watts St. (off 6th Ave., one block north of Canal St.) Tickets will be available at the door. Because of the number of people expected, it is strongly suggested you reserve your tickets for either or both nights by mail. You can see the handy coupon below. Just send in admission price and you will receive your return ticket by mail. Be sure to Include the desired date(s).
So, if you feel as we do, that the scene has needed a plush and comfortable place for men and women to meet in, then come and enjoy.
THE LOFT - it's about time !
- Dates: Friday, September 19th & Saturday September 20th.
- Time: 9:00 P.M. till the wee hours
Chat rooms • What links here • Copyright info • Contact information • Category:Root